|
'Fear': An Exchange
Letters to the Editor
New York Times, August 20 2006
In his review of
"Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland After Auschwitz,"
by Jan T. Gross (July 23), David Margolick writes:
"With the war over, and to tumultuous applause, a
thousand delegates of the Polish Peasants Party actually
passed a resolution thanking Hitler for
annihilating Polish Jewry and urging that those he'd
missed be expelled."
The book in fact reads (on Page 226): "In turn the
third speaker took the rostrum (his name unknown) and
by analogy to a thesis from [Minister of Public Administration]
Kiernik's speech that Poland must be a mono-ethnic
state [this was apropos of expulsions of the German
population from newly incorporated territories] put
out a resolution that Jews should also be expelled
from Poland, and he also remarked that Hitler ought
to be thanked for destroying the Jews (tumultuous ovation
and applause)."
Note that the remark about thanking Hitler was not
part of the proposed resolution, and there is no indication
that the resolution was ever adopted.
Charles Chotkowski
Fairfield, Conn.
The
writer is director of research of the Holocaust Documentation
Committee, Polish American Congress.
To the
Editor:
David Margolick states that
80 Jews were killed in the Kielce pogrom of July 4,
1946. Just a few weeks ago, those who gathered to commemorate
the 60th anniversary of this sad event, myself included,
remembered the lives of 41 Jews who were killed on
that day. Gross himself notes that "several dozen"
Jews were killed. Margolick's figure, unless he is
able to produce solid evidence to the contrary, is
erroneous.
Sarah A. Cramsey
Allentown, Pa.
To the Editor:
Margolick, speaking
of the wartime period, writes that Poles killed thousands
of Jews, "most famously, as Gross related in 'Neighbors'
(2001), a book that caused an uproar in Poland, 1,600
of them in the town of Jedwabne in July 1941 - crimes
little noted at the time nor since remembered in Polish
history books."
Why is the number 1,600 still
being quoted, or rather, misquoted, as conclusive?
On July 9, 2002, after an intense, long-awaited investigation,
the Institute of National Remembrance in Poland issued
a widely accepted report on the Jedwabne murders, available
online at www.ipn.gov.pl/eng/eng_konf_jedwabne_press.html.
The report cites eyewitness
accounts of two groups of victims, who were led from
the town marketplace to a nearby barn, where they were
murdered. The first group "may have consisted of 40
to 50 people," the report found, while the other "included
several hundred people, probably about 300, which is
confirmed by the number of victims in both graves.
... The figure of 1,600 victims or so seems highly
unlikely, and it was not confirmed in the course of
the investigation."
Rather than continuing to take
Gross at face value, why don't Margolick and the Book
Review recognize that it was approximately 40 Polish
perpetrators responsible for the death of several hundred
Jews in German-occupied Jedwabne, and not 1,600? Not
to diminish this event in any way, numbers do represent
an integral part of historical accuracy.
Eugene Markow
Siemiechow, Poland
To the Editor:
As a Polish citizen who arrived
in the United States six years ago to undertake my
graduate degree and later married an American, I am
concerned that Margolick's review might leave anunfairimpression
of the Polish attitude toward Jews today. In the 25
years that I lived in Poland, I never witnessed any
anti-Semitism from anyone in my family - including
the elders - my friends or my schools. I am deeply
sympathetic to the horrendous suffering Jews have endured,
I fully support their desire to share their experiences,
and I do not doubt the validity of Gross's book. Isimply
want to emphasize the fact that, thankfully, anti-Semitism
is no longer part ofthe Polishculture.
Monika Wurr
Phoenix
To the Editor:
Margolick writes off the Poles
as incurable anti-Semites. First, he dismisses contemporary
Poland as "a place of necro-nostalgia." Margolick sees
no redeeming value in what, I believe, is actually
a very healthy phenomenon: many young Poles (with Catholic
or Jewish roots) are interested in all the cultures
of their once multiethnic country. This interest in
the pre-Holocaust culture of Polish Jews goes beyond
the death in the Holocaust to affirm the life that
was before it.
Second, in mentioning the recent
street attack by a hooligan against Poland's chief
rabbi, Michael Schudrich, Margolick fails to mention
the public's outrage or the meeting that took place
one day later between Poland's president and Schudrich.
After the president expressed his solidarity and assured
Schudrich that he would not tolerate anti-Semitic incidents,
Schudrich left "feeling touched" by the president's
gesture (Gazeta Wyborcza, June 29).
Maya Latynski
Washington
David
Margolick replies:
Charles
Chotkowskiis correct: while the suggestionthat Hitler
be thanked for exterminating Polish Jewry met with
tumultuous applause from delegates of the Polish Peasants
Party, it was not put to a formal vote. (Readers can
decide the significance of this distinction.) My figure
forthe death toll in Kielce comes from Gross, whoincludesJews
killed in the vicinity of thecity,often in and around
neighboring train stations;"news of the pogrom traveled
out of Kielce," he writes, "and found a receptive audience
keen to emulate the effort." When one takes these victims
intoaccount, he continues, "the total murdered may
have topped 80."
As for the toll at Jedwabne,
Eugene Markow ishalf-right: while the panel disputed
the figure of 1,600 (the prewar Jewish population there,
reduced to zero by war's end),it concluded that the
real figure would probably never be known. And as reported
in many places, The New York Times among them, anyone
who listens to the Catholic Radio Maryja knows that
Polish anti-Semitism lives on, fond wishes and official
condemnations notwithstanding.
|