|
Nobel winner Milosz, who
wrote of Holocaust and memory, dies at 93
By: Ruth Ellen Gruber
ITA, Rome
August 17, 2004
ROME, Aug. 17 (JTA) - Nobel prize-winning
Polish poet Czeslaw Milosz, who died Aug. 14 at age
93, was close to Jews and Jewish causes from and early
age and some of his most eloquent and disturbing works
dealt with the Holocaust, Holocaust memory and the complex
relations between Jews and Catholic Poles.
Milosz grappled powerfully with
the physical and intellectual effects of the brutality,
oppression and mass destruction that marked the 20th
century in Europe.
Though the Poles themselves did
not devise or mastermind the Holocaust, Milosz felt
the destruction on Polish soil of 3 million Polish Jews
in the Holocaust left his native land 'sullied, blood-stained,
desecrated.'. Poles, he believed, had to recognize this.
One of his most famous poems, "Campo dei Fiori,"
written in 1943, described how Poles outside the Warsaw
Ghetto were oblivious to the fate of the Jews as the
Nazis destroyed the ghetto.
In the poem, he evoked the unforgettable image of a
merry-go-round outside the ghetto walls happily spinning
as the ghetto itself went up in flames
"The salvoes behind the ghetto walls
were drowned in lively tunes,
and vapors freely rose
into the tranquil sky.
Sometimes the wind from burning houses
would bring the kites along,
and people on the merry-go-round
caught the flying charred bits.
This wind from burning houses
blew open the girls' skirts,
and the happy throngs laughed
on a beautiful Warsaw Sunday."
This and another Milosz poem about
Polish indifference to the destruction of the ghetto
sparked one of Poland's first important public debates
on the issue of Holocaust guilt and memory, which was
carried out in a series of essays and articles in the
late 1980s.
Milosz was born in 1911 in what is now Lithuania. In
Vilnius in the 1930s he was part of a literary circle
called Zagary, which had close relations with the "Young
Vilna" group of ewish writers.
Milosz moved to Warsaw in 1937
after being fired from the radio station where he worked,
for associating with Jews.
After World War II he served as
a diplomat for communist Poland, but in 1951 broke with
the regime and defected to the West, eventually settling
in the United States, where he taught at the University
of California at Berkeley.
During his exile, his works, including
his most famous book, "The Captive Mind,"
made him a powerful symbol of intellectual freedom and
anti-Communist dissent. That book, a collection of essays
published in 1953, described the pressures exerted on
intellectual life by totalitarianism.
Much of Milosz's work also dealt
with the plight of living in exile. He moved back to
his native country after the ouster of the communists
in 1989.
In his Nobel acceptance speech
in 1980, Milosz described how memory of the Holocaust
was fading and becoming distorted, and how the complexities
and nuances of history were becoming forgotten.
"We are surrounded today
by fictions about the past, contrary to common sense
and to an elementary perception of good and evil,"
he said.
Already, he noted, "the number
of books in various languages which deny that the Holocaust
ever took place, that it was invented by Jewish propaganda,"
exceeded 100.
"If such an insanity is possible,
is a complete loss of memory as a permanent state of
mind improbable?" he asked. "And would it
not present a danger more grave than genetic engineering
or poisoning of the natural environment?"
For a poet coming from the "other"
- Communist-dominated Europe - he said, "the events
embraced by the name of the Holocaust are a reality,
so close in time that he cannot hope to liberate himself
from their remembrance unless, perhaps, by translating
the Psalms of David."
Still, Milosz said, he felt "anxiety"
when 'the meaning of the word Holocaust undergoes gradual
modifications, so that the word begins to belong to
the history of the Jews exclusively, as if among the
victims there were not also millions of Poles, Russians,
Ukrainians and prisoners of other nationalities.
"He feels anxiety, for he
senses in this a foreboding of a not-distant future
when history will be reduced to what appears on television,
while the truth, as it is too complicated, will be buried
in the archives, if not totally annihilated."
|